[elbe-devel] [PATCH] dump: remove 2nd extract of archive
Holger Dengler
dengler at linutronix.de
Thu Dec 7 09:28:02 CET 2017
On 12/07/2017 08:59 AM, John Ogness wrote:
> On 2017-12-07, Manuel Traut <manuel.traut at linutronix.de> wrote:
>>> Originally archive extraction occurred only after the finetuning step.
>>> With commit 33d0e328b74d ("extract archive before finetuning to be
>>> able to use the files.") extraction was added before the finetuning
>>> step to allow finetuning to use archive files. However, the extraction
>>> after finetuning was never removed. This dramatically reduces the
>>> benefits of finetuning being able to manipulate the archive files.
>>>
>>> Remove archive extraction after the finetuning step.
>>>
>>> Update the logic to determine file origins in the elbe report
>>> based on this new ordering.
>>
>> Thanks, this is a change that was requested a few times.
>>
>> However, this might brake image builds that (accidently) delete files in
>> finetuning that are in the archive and expect them to be in the RFS.
>
> Nothing in finetuning should be accidental.
>
> Rather than making the pre-finetuning extract nearly useless in order to
> "help" users with broken finetuning rules, I think it would make more
> sense to add a warning (or error!) that a fine-tuning rule deleted a
> file from the archive. This would be trivial to implement. I'm happy to
> provide a patch for this.
I prefer your solution. But not only deleting files may cause different results (compared to current elbe versions), every modification of a file from the archive must also race a warning.
>> I'm fine if we introduce a attribute for the archive tag.
>>
>> <archive extraction='after_finetuning|before_finetuning'>
>
> In my opinion extracting after finetuning is wrong. I cannot think of
> any case where I want to blindly unpack files *after* I've done
> customizing.
>
> Let's fix elbe instead of finding reasons to keep it broken.
>
> John Ogness
>
> _______________________________________________
> elbe-devel mailing list
> elbe-devel at linutronix.de
> https://lists.linutronix.de/mailman/listinfo/elbe-devel
>
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen/Kind regards,
Holger Dengler
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linutronix.de/pipermail/elbe-devel/attachments/20171207/b1c5d1cc/attachment.sig>
More information about the elbe-devel
mailing list