[elbe-devel] [PATCH 6/9] finetuning: implement <mount_drive> action

Manuel Traut manut at linutronix.de
Tue Dec 4 15:19:43 CET 2018


On 15:06 Tue 04 Dec     , Torben Hohn wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 03:14:40PM +0100, Manuel Traut wrote:
> > On 17:29 Wed 28 Nov     , Torben Hohn wrote:
> > > <mount_drive> is an action for <project-finetuning>
> > > it nests around other actions, which are ImageFinetuning
> > > actions. These have an execute_img() method which adds
> > > the name of the loop_device to the parameter list.
> > > 
> > > example:
> > > 
> > > <mount_drive img="sda.img">
> > >    <extract_partition part="2">sda2.img</extract_partition>
> > > </mount_drive>
> > > 
> > > the extract partition action is implemented in a followup patch.
> > > ---
> > >  elbepack/finetuning.py | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  schema/dbsfed.xsd      | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  2 files changed, 77 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/elbepack/finetuning.py b/elbepack/finetuning.py
> > > index 1aaeda67..c53b13c6 100644
> > > --- a/elbepack/finetuning.py
> > > +++ b/elbepack/finetuning.py
> > > @@ -44,6 +44,21 @@ class FinetuningAction(object):
> > >          self.execute(log, buildenv, target)
> > >  
> > >  
> > > +class ImageFinetuningAction(FinetuningAction):
> > > +
> > > +    tag = 'image_finetuning'
> > > +
> > > +    def __init__(self, node):
> > > +        FinetuningAction.__init__(self, node)
> > > +
> > > +    def execute(self, _log, _buildenv, _target):
> > > +        raise NotImplementedError("<%s> may only be "
> > > +                                  "used in <image-finetuning>" % self.tag)
> > > +
> > > +    def execute_img(self, _log, _buildenv, _target, _builddir, _loop_dev):
> > > +        raise NotImplementedError('execute_img() not implemented')
> > > +
> > 
> > Isn't
> >   def execute_prj(self, log, buildenv, target, _builddir):
> >         raise NotImplementedError('execute_img() not implemented')
> > missing here?
> > 
> > Also the FinetuningAction class should default to NotImplementedError for all
> > execute_* functions?
> 
> no. 
> 
> FinetuningAction.execute_prj() is implemented.
> it calls self.execute() 
> ImageFinetuningAction inherits it.

OK. Overseen.

However i would like to 'raise NotImplementedError('execute_prj() not
implemented')' instead of getting an Error that claims that 'execute()'
is not implemented.

> > > +
> > >  class RmAction(FinetuningAction):
> > >  
> > >      tag = 'rm'
> > > @@ -525,6 +540,35 @@ class RmArtifactAction(FinetuningAction):
> > >  FinetuningAction.register(ArtifactAction)
> > >  
> > >  
> > > +class MountDriveImageAction(FinetuningAction):
> > > +
> > > +    tag = 'mount_drive'
> > > +
> > > +    def __init__(self, node):
> > > +        FinetuningAction.__init__(self, node)
> > 
> > than
> > > +    def execute(self, _log, _buildenv, _target):
> > > +        raise NotImplementedError("<mount_drive> may only be "
> > > +                                  "used in <project-finetuning>")
> > could be dropped
> > 
> > > +    def execute_prj(self, log, buildenv, target, builddir):
> > > +        imgname = self.node.et.attrib['img']
> > > +        imgpath = os.path.join(builddir, imgname)
> > > +        cmd = 'losetup --find --show --partscan "%s"' % imgpath
> > > +
> > > +        loop_dev = log.get_command_out(cmd).strip()
> > > +        try:
> > > +            for i in self.node:
> > > +                action = ImageFinetuningAction(i)
> > > +                action.execute_img(log, buildenv, target, builddir, loop_dev)
> > > +        finally:
> > > +            cmd = 'losetup --detach "%s"' % loop_dev
> > > +            log.do(cmd)
> > > +
> > > +
> > > +FinetuningAction.register(MountDriveImageAction)
> > > +
> > > +
> > >  def do_finetuning(xml, log, buildenv, target):
> > >  
> > >      if not xml.has('target/finetuning'):
> > > diff --git a/schema/dbsfed.xsd b/schema/dbsfed.xsd
> > > index e0b6eecb..d9317c72 100644
> > > --- a/schema/dbsfed.xsd
> > > +++ b/schema/dbsfed.xsd
> > > @@ -1890,6 +1890,39 @@
> > >            </documentation>
> > >          </annotation>
> > >        </element>
> > > +      <element name="mount_drive" type="rfs:mount_drive" minOccurs="0">
> > > +        <annotation>
> > > +          <documentation>
> > > +            Setup the loop device with an image file. This node wraps image_finetuning
> > > +	    Actions, which access the loop device then.
> > > +          </documentation>
> > > +        </annotation>
> > > +      </element>
> > > +    </choice>
> > > +  </group>
> > > +
> > > +  <complexType name="mount_drive">
> > > +    <annotation>
> > > +      <documentation>
> > > +         container for image_finetuning commands; these commands are executed in the
> > > +	 project directory, while a drive image is setup as a loop device.
> > > +	 The loop device id is passed to the individual actions.
> > > +      </documentation>
> > > +    </annotation>
> > > +    <sequence>
> > > +      <group ref="rfs:image_action" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" />
> > > +    </sequence>
> > > +    <attribute ref="xml:base"/>
> > > +    <attribute name="img" type="string" use="required" />
> > > +  </complexType>
> > > +
> > > +  <group name="image_action">
> > > +    <annotation>
> > > +      <documentation>
> > > +        definition of image finetuning commands
> > > +      </documentation>
> > > +    </annotation>
> > > +    <choice>
> > >      </choice>
> > >    </group>
> > >  
> > > -- 
> > > 2.11.0





More information about the elbe-devel mailing list