[elbe-devel] [PATCH] build_sysroot: build sysroot in seperate buildenv
John Ogness
john.ogness at linutronix.de
Fri Jul 20 16:45:12 CEST 2018
On 2018-07-20, John Ogness <john.ogness at linutronix.de> wrote:
>>> diff --git a/elbepack/elbeproject.py b/elbepack/elbeproject.py
>>> index be23410d..6a8090ff 100644
>>> --- a/elbepack/elbeproject.py
>>> +++ b/elbepack/elbeproject.py
>>> @@ -191,6 +192,12 @@ class ElbeProject (object):
>>> else:
>>> self.targetfs = None
>>>
>>> + # dont create sysroot instance, it should be build from scratch
>>> + # each time, because the pkglist including the -dev packages is
>>> + # tracked nowhere.
>>> + self.sysrootenv = None
>
> We probably want to make sure there is no sysroot laying around.
>
> self.log.do('rm -rf %s; mkdir "%s"' % (self.sysrootpath,
> self.sysrootpath))
Sorry. Obviously it should not recreate an empty directory.
self.log.do('rm -rf %s' % self.sysrootpath)
>
> This code already exists in build_sysroot, but that is maybe too
> late. Consider the following:
>
> set_xml
> build
> build_sysroot
> set_xml
> build
> build_cdroms (introduced in a later patch)
>
> With that sequence of commands, the packages from the sysroot-env will
> be used instead of those from the build-env. And since the 2nd xml could
> be totally different, a totally incorrect cdroms will be generated.
>
> You should probably add this code to set_xml as well since it is very
> similar:
>
> self.sysrootenv = None
> self.log.do('rm -rf %s; mkdir "%s"' % (self.sysrootpath,
> self.sysrootpath))
And here as well.
self.log.do('rm -rf %s' % self.sysrootpath)
More information about the elbe-devel
mailing list